Labour

Burnham Government approves above-inflation train-driver deal after strike threat

The Burnham Government has approved an Avanti West Coast train-driver deal giving Aslef members a 3.6% pay rise, time-and-a-half on Sundays and improved rest-day payments after a threat of strike action.

By Charlotte Mercer • Published 30 August 2026 at 10:35 • 4 min read
Share article X Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp Email

The Burnham Government has approved an above-inflation pay deal for Avanti West Coast train drivers after a dispute threatened strike action on one of Britain's busiest intercity rail routes.

Drivers represented by Aslef will receive a 3.6% single-year pay rise, alongside time-and-a-half pay for Sundays and improved payments for rest-day working.

The agreement was negotiated between Avanti West Coast and Aslef and approved by the Department for Transport Operator. It is the first Avanti pay settlement approved under Prime Minister Andy Burnham's Government.

The Department for Transport said the settlement was both “fair and affordable” and would prevent disruption for passengers.

3.6% rise plus improved Sunday payments

Under the agreement, Avanti drivers will receive a 3.6% increase in basic salary.

That is 0.7 percentage points above the latest 2.9% inflation figure cited in reports of the agreement.

Aslef has also secured time-and-a-half pay for Sunday working and payments of up to £720 for drivers who work a fifth day of the working week.

The union described the agreement as an improvement to members' pay and conditions and confirmed that the deal had been accepted.

An Aslef spokesperson said the union's role was to improve its members' terms and conditions, adding that the agreement had been struck with Avanti and approved by the Department for Transport Operator.

Deal follows threat of industrial action

The settlement follows a dispute that had threatened further disruption on the West Coast Main Line.

Aslef announced at the end of June that Avanti drivers would be balloted on industrial action after the union rejected the company's 2026 pay offer.

At the time, Aslef said it believed an agreement had previously been reached with the company but claimed approval from the Department for Transport had not been forthcoming.

Avanti said it was disappointed by the ballot decision but remained willing to work with the union to resolve the dispute.

The eventual settlement therefore represents a significant change from the position earlier in the summer, when drivers were preparing to vote on possible strike action.

Government says deal will prevent disruption

The Department for Transport has defended the agreement as a means of keeping trains running and avoiding the financial cost of industrial action.

A department spokesperson said the Government had prioritised resolving rail disputes, improving services for passengers and reducing the revenue lost when trains are disrupted by strikes.

The DfT said it was pleased Avanti and Aslef had reached what it called a “fair and affordable settlement” that would keep Britain's railways moving and prevent disruption for passengers.

First Avanti deal under Burnham

The agreement has attracted additional political attention because it is the first Avanti West Coast pay settlement approved since Andy Burnham became Prime Minister.

Avanti operates the West Coast Main Line between London Euston and major cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow.

The London-Manchester connection has taken on greater political prominence since Burnham established No 10 North in Manchester, although the settlement covers Avanti drivers more broadly rather than being a deal specifically for the Prime Minister's route.

While some reports have described the agreement as a deal personally approved or brokered by Burnham, the confirmed position is more precise: the settlement was negotiated by Avanti West Coast and Aslef and approved by the Department for Transport Operator.

Conservatives accuse Labour of capitulation

The Conservatives have attacked the settlement, arguing that ministers have conceded too much to the rail unions.

Shadow Transport Secretary Richard Holden accused Labour of “totally capitulating to their union paymasters” and argued that passengers and taxpayers would ultimately bear the cost.

The Government rejects that argument, saying avoiding industrial action protects passengers while preventing the substantial loss of fare revenue associated with widespread disruption.

Avanti has faced serious performance problems

The pay agreement comes against a difficult operational backdrop for Avanti.

The operator has faced criticism over cancellations, punctuality and reliance on drivers volunteering to work additional days.

Rest-day working has been particularly important because disruption can increase when insufficient drivers volunteer for overtime or additional shifts.

The improved arrangements for fifth-day working are therefore significant not simply as additional remuneration for drivers but because of their potential effect on the reliability of the timetable.

Strike threat appears to have been headed off

The accepted agreement means the immediate pay dispute that prompted the industrial-action ballot has been resolved.

There is currently no announced Avanti strike arising from this dispute.

For the Burnham Government, the settlement provides an early test of its approach to the rail unions: ministers can point to the avoidance of disruption, while opponents are likely to focus on the above-inflation rise and additional payments secured by Aslef.

The distinction is important. The Government approved the settlement, but the available evidence does not establish that Burnham personally negotiated the terms with Aslef.

Sources

  1. The Independent/PA: Andy Burnham agrees pay rises for train drivers after threat of strike action — 29 August 2026
  2. LBC: Train drivers set to receive 3.6% pay rise — 30 August 2026
  3. ITV News: Avanti West Coast train drivers to vote on strike action in pay dispute — 30 June 2026
  4. Avanti West Coast: Strike action travel information
Have a different view?

Write a response.

Challenge the argument, add relevant evidence or explain how this issue affects people in practice. We welcome thoughtful, evidence-led contributions from across the political debate.

Write for Ayes To The Right
Know this MP?

Have first-hand knowledge or experience?

Have you worked with Andy Burnham? Do you have direct experience of this issue, their work or their recent parliamentary record?

We are interested in informed perspectives, constructive criticism and accounts that help readers understand the subject more clearly.

Write an article about this topic

Related articles