Chancellor John Healey reportedly supports approving the Rosebank oilfield in the North Sea, amid accounts of differing views within the Government over whether the controversial development should proceed.
The Guardian reported on 25 October 2026 that Healey favours the project, while Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh is understood to be leaning towards refusing approval. These positions are based on reporting and have not been announced as formal decisions by the ministers concerned.
Decision remains outstanding
Rosebank, situated north-west of Shetland, remains subject to the environmental assessment and consent process. The UK Government's published Rosebank project record lists the environmental statement as under review. There has been no confirmed final approval or refusal of the renewed application.
In a written parliamentary answer on 14 September, ministers said decisions on Rosebank and Jackdaw were proceeding through the regulatory process. The energy secretary's agreement is required before the North Sea Transition Authority can grant consent.
Jobs, revenue and climate commitments
Supporters of Rosebank argue that North Sea development could sustain jobs and contribute tax revenues. Opponents question its compatibility with Britain's emissions targets and point to the carbon emissions associated with burning the oil produced.
The distinction between Rosebank and the separately considered Jackdaw gasfield has become central to the debate. Rosebank's oil is expected to be transported by tanker, while the developer's project description says gas would be exported through an existing pipeline system.
Reported divisions, not a government decision
Reports of ministerial disagreement could put pressure on Prime Minister Andy Burnham to resolve competing economic and environmental priorities. However, neither a Cabinet decision nor an intervention by the Prime Minister has been formally confirmed.
With the Budget approaching, the debate also raises questions about potential North Sea revenues and the Government's approach to energy investment. Any fiscal benefit remains contingent on the project's approval, production and prevailing market conditions.