Labour

Government Rejects MPs’ Call to Extend Employer National Insurance Relief to Under-25s

Ministers have rejected a cross-party committee recommendation to extend employer National Insurance relief to all workers under 25, amid concerns over youth employment costs.

By Staff member • Published 16 October 2026 at 07:44 • 2 min read
Share article X Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp Email

The government has rejected a recommendation from MPs to extend employer National Insurance relief to all workers under the age of 25, as businesses and parliamentarians raise concerns about the cost of recruiting young people.

The decision was set out in the government's response to the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee report on youth employment, education and training, published on 15 October 2026.

What did MPs propose?

The cross-party committee recommended extending the existing National Insurance Upper Secondary Threshold to all employees under 25. Under the proposal, employers would not pay Class 1 employer National Insurance on earnings up to £50,270 a year for those workers.

Current relief generally applies to employees under 21 and qualifying apprentices under 25, on earnings up to that threshold. For other employees, employer contributions normally apply above a substantially lower earnings threshold.

Why did ministers reject the proposal?

In its formal response, the government declined to accept the committee's recommendation, pointing to decisions on taxation and spending required to protect the public finances and fund public services.

The rejection concerns this specific proposed extension. It does not amount to a commitment that the Chancellor will make no other changes to employer National Insurance at the forthcoming Budget.

Concerns about youth recruitment

In its July report, the committee described evidence from employers that higher employment costs were restricting recruitment and training opportunities for young people. It cited Resolution Foundation analysis estimating that removing employer National Insurance for under-25s could increase youth employment by around 38,000, at an estimated fiscal cost of £5.1 billion. These are modelled estimates, not observed outcomes.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has separately proposed halving employer National Insurance for workers aged 21 to 24. That proposal differs from the committee's recommendation to extend the existing relief.

What happens next?

The government's response arrives ahead of the 28 October Budget, when ministers may set out further tax and employment measures. The parliamentary committee's recommendation has not been adopted, and any future policy change would require a separate announcement.

Sources

  1. House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee: Government response, HC 702 — 15 October 2026
  2. Work and Pensions Committee: Youth employment, education and training — 22 July 2026
  3. HM Treasury parliamentary answer: Existing employer NIC reliefs — 9 June 2026
Have a different view?

Write a response.

Challenge the argument, add relevant evidence or explain how this issue affects people in practice. We welcome thoughtful, evidence-led contributions from across the political debate.

Write for Ayes To The Right
Know this MP?

Have first-hand knowledge or experience?

Have you worked with Mrs Kemi Badenoch? Do you have direct experience of this issue, their work or their recent parliamentary record?

We are interested in informed perspectives, constructive criticism and accounts that help readers understand the subject more clearly.

Write an article about this topic

Related articles