Labour

Kinnock urges Burnham to introduce compulsory voting in UK elections

Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock has urged Prime Minister Andy Burnham to introduce compulsory voting, arguing that declining turnout is distorting election results.

By Charlotte Mercer • Published 20 September 2026 at 16:00 • 4 min read
Share article X Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp Email

Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock has urged Prime Minister Andy Burnham to introduce compulsory voting in UK elections, arguing that falling and unequal turnout is producing distorted results and weakening democratic accountability.

Lord Kinnock said requiring citizens to participate in elections was becoming increasingly justified and necessary, adding his voice to mounting pressure for a wider overhaul of Britain's electoral system.

Former Home Secretary David Blunkett is also expected to support the parliamentary effort, while an international group of academics is preparing to write to Downing Street to argue that unequal levels of participation are distorting British politics.

However, compulsory voting is not Government policy. Ministers have not announced support for the proposal and are instead emphasising measures contained in the Representation of the People Bill, including votes at 16 and moves towards automated voter registration.

Voters could still reject every candidate

The proposal would require eligible voters to participate in an election, but it would not force them to support any political party or candidate.

People who did not wish to endorse anyone on the ballot could still meet the requirement by attending the poll and returning a blank or deliberately spoiled ballot paper.

Supporters therefore argue that the policy would create a duty to take part rather than a duty to vote for one of the available options.

Advocates frequently point to Australia, where compulsory voting has operated at federal elections since 1924. Belgium also has a longstanding system requiring citizens to participate in elections, although the way compulsory voting is enforced varies between countries.

Previous British proposals have included exemptions for people with a valid reason for not voting and modest financial penalties for those who fail to participate without justification. No final British model has been agreed.

Kinnock warns of distorted democracy

Lord Kinnock's intervention focuses on the political consequences of declining turnout and the substantial differences in participation between sections of the population.

Younger people and those with fewer formal qualifications have historically been less likely to vote than older people and graduates. Campaigners argue that this encourages governments and political parties to concentrate on the interests of groups most likely to turn out.

Research highlighted during the wider debate found that turnout at the 2024 general election stood at 56 per cent among people aged between 18 and 24, compared with 81 per cent among those aged 61 and over. A gap of approximately 20 percentage points was also reported between graduates and voters with the fewest qualifications.

Supporters of compulsion contend that near-universal participation would make election results more representative and require parties to appeal to the whole electorate rather than dependable groups of voters.

Opponents argue that choosing not to participate is itself a democratic right and that the state should not fine or otherwise punish citizens for disengaging from politics. They also question whether requiring attendance would create better-informed voters or greater trust in the political system.

Pressure builds for electoral reform

The intervention comes as Burnham faces broader calls to examine how Britain conducts elections.

Nearly 100 Labour MPs have previously pressed the Prime Minister to establish a national commission on electoral reform, including consideration of alternatives to the first-past-the-post system used for general elections.

Burnham has expressed support for electoral reform and pledged to make the case for change ahead of a future Labour manifesto. Downing Street has not, however, committed to compulsory voting or confirmed that it will establish the proposed commission.

Think tanks influential within Labour circles have already examined compulsory participation. MPs have also attempted to add a duty to vote to electoral legislation, with proposed safeguards allowing people to return blank ballots or claim reasonable exemptions.

Government prioritises removing voting barriers

Responding to the latest campaign, a Government spokesperson said ministers were currently focused on removing barriers that prevent people from voting.

The Representation of the People Bill includes plans to lower the voting age to 16 and measures intended to move Britain towards automatic voter registration.

Those changes are designed to increase participation without requiring people to cast a ballot. The Government's response therefore leaves compulsory voting outside its announced programme, despite growing support for the idea among several senior Labour figures.

Kinnock's intervention nevertheless ensures the proposal will remain part of the wider electoral-reform debate confronting Burnham, particularly as campaigners seek changes capable of addressing the sharp participation gap between different generations and social groups.

Sources

  1. The Times: Compulsory voting and electoral reform under Andy Burnham
  2. The Guardian: Labour MPs push Burnham to back voting reform
  3. UK Parliament: Representation of the People Bill
  4. UK Government: Representation of the People Bill policy summaries
  5. UK Government: Votes at 16 policy summary
Have a different view?

Write a response.

Challenge the argument, add relevant evidence or explain how this issue affects people in practice. We welcome thoughtful, evidence-led contributions from across the political debate.

Write for Ayes To The Right
Know this MP?

Have first-hand knowledge or experience?

Have you worked with Andy Burnham? Do you have direct experience of this issue, their work or their recent parliamentary record?

We are interested in informed perspectives, constructive criticism and accounts that help readers understand the subject more clearly.

Write an article about this topic

Related articles